001Concept note · Exploration
Can small teams obtain reliable, affordable R&D support without building a complete research institution?
- Proposed mechanism
- Combine specialists, AI tools, authorized compute and experimental capabilities around a task brief. Agree delivery, acceptance, ownership and escalation before execution.
- Critical unknown
- Task specification is feasible; specialist supply is reliable; coordination stays affordable; outputs are verifiable; demand repeats; responsibilities can be agreed.
- Next proposed step
- Proposed first step: interview three task owners about one non-sensitive, checkable engineering task. Compare current alternatives and prepare a delivery brief. Execute one bounded test only after a partner and acceptance method are agreed.
Read concept note ↗002Concept note · Exploration
Can high-quality development support grow without requiring a few experts to keep adding personal working hours?
- Proposed mechanism
- Describe one service workflow, distinguish reusable preparation from professional judgment, and introduce reviewed assistance plus a feedback loop. Coaching is one candidate context, not a committed study.
- Critical unknown
- Quality is maintained; time burden decreases; users keep engaging; the workflow transfers beyond one expert or setting.
- Next proposed step
- Propose an adult-facing preparation task: record the current workflow, define a quality rubric with the professional, and compare manually reviewed assistance using synthetic examples before any live use.
Read concept note ↗003Concept note · Exploration
Can better resource organization help a place sustain services and production capabilities it could not otherwise provide?
- Proposed mechanism
- For one capability, map owners, users, maintainers and payers. Compare usage rights, maintenance duties, booking and cost-sharing arrangements before proposing a trial.
- Critical unknown
- A real resource gap exists; access is permitted; demand repeats; maintenance has an owner; costs and benefits can be fairly allocated.
- Next proposed step
- Propose a resource-and-demand map through consenting stakeholder interviews. Identify one gap, estimate use and maintenance requirements, and decide whether a small scheduling simulation is worth designing.
Read concept note ↗